Symptoms

What this usually looks like

Payable amount exceeds tax-inclusive totalTotals fail after a charge or rounding lineValidation error is too technical
Likely cause

What is usually actually broken

A duplicated charge, cash-rounding export, or settlement adjustment was applied after the main totals were computed.

Next steps

Do these before you resend

  1. Review settlement lines, prepayments, and manual charges first.
  2. Compare the payable amount against the tax-inclusive amount inside the ERP, not just in the XML.
  3. Regenerate a clean invoice export after the totals reconcile.

The fastest path from this page is a prefilled diagnosis. It opens the analyzer with this exact issue pattern already loaded and immediately prepares the EUR 9 fix-pack preview when the route looks blocked or risky.

Direct help

Buy the rescue kit for this exact issue

If this page matches the exact blocker, you can unlock the issue-specific rescue kit directly without running the analyzer first.

FAQ

What people ask right before they get blocked

Is this the same as BR-CO-10?

It can surface alongside BR-CO-10, but this phrasing points to the specific arithmetic symptom you should inspect first.

What usually changed before this happened?

Late charges, rounding logic, prepayments, or manual adjustments are common triggers.

Operator guides

Go one level deeper before you resend

BR-CO-10 and cash-rounding errors without the validator fog

A field-by-field guide for totals mismatches, payable amount drift, and rounding side effects in e-invoice exports.

Read the guide
Related issues

Similar failure patterns worth checking

BR-CO-10 explained without validator jargon

If you hit BR-CO-10, the invoice totals do not reconcile. This page translates the rule into practical bookkeeping and ERP checks.

Open issue page
Cash rounding is breaking Peppol totals

Rounding logic that looks harmless in the ERP can still produce totals that fail e-invoice validation. This page isolates the most common pattern.

Open issue page